This is a comment text. The author is responsible for the analysis and positioning in the text.
My partner had noticed at dinner that one of her acquaintances was in a dilemma. Her son wanted a book for Christmas for the first time in his life. The book, however, was “Staten mot Kapitalet” by the Allra violinist Alexander Ernstberger.
Ernstberger had apparently become something of an icon on Tiktok.
I wrote a short comment (Arbetet, 20/1) that young people can look up whatever Tiktok shenanigans they want, but that the book is unfortunately pretty boring. An “I am Zlatan”, but about a man from Strandvägen who, against all odds, founded a telemarketing company in a basement.
Everything spiced up with a conspiracy theory in which Magdalena Andersson, Ardalan Shekarabi and the pension authority ordered an appeal court ruling that sentenced Ernstberger to a few years in high-risk prison – for violating the Jantel law.
After just a few A few days ago, Victor De Almeida from the YouTube channel Dialogisk heard from me and asked if I would like to discuss with the author. The influencer apparently has free access to the eco-criminal, who has been on a digital Eriksgata for six months, alternating between hanging out with 17-year-old dirty boys on Tiktok and protesting his innocence to not-too-responsible online celebrities like Anis Don Demina.
Instead, Ernstberger claims that he was the victim of judicial murder by the deep social democratic state.
My premise for acceptance was that De Almeida would read my own book on Swedish social corruption. Ernstberger also writes in his book about so-called “soft corruption” – i.e. nepotism. But it’s also not about how Allra tried to clear his stomach by recruiting well-known politicians like Thomas Bodström, Anton Abele and Gunnar Axén. Instead, Ernstberger claims that he was the victim of judicial murder by the deep social democratic state.
Something that contradicts the usual picture of the behavior of the country’s power elite over the last half century and would certainly be interesting to discuss.
So there you stood like an idiot, surrounded by ads for energy drinks and testosterone shots
The YouTuber accepted the premise, but about five minutes into the debate it became apparent that he clearly hadn’t read my book. Instead, the man known as “the local Malou von Sivers” – who was not best known for his critical counter-questions – seemed like a bird’s nest in every lengthy argument. That wasn’t anyone such a conversation. So there you stood like an idiot, surrounded by ads for energy drinks and testosterone shots.
This is almost always the case It’s a bit silly when guys combine emotion and click-chasing with a tacked-on love for the healing power of conversation – regardless of what is actually said.
Pontus “Anjo” Björlund, best known to a non-Youtube audience for the SVT review “Hatet,” invited a representative of the Nazi Nordic Resistance Movement to speak with the cartel’s Leo “Kinesen” Carmona.
Anjo told his 200,000 followers, mostly young people, that he would sit and just listen “like a curious little student.”
Then came the indisputable statements of two foil guards about how our misled Swedish people need to wake up, George Soros and why the Holocaust was self-defense against attacks on the German race and the nuclear family.
The problem with one Overestimation of oneself in dialogue is not only found on YouTube. In 2018, the Hornstull library invited a right-wing extremist to a panel discussion that transcended opinion boundaries. RFSL is said to have taught children anal sex, and lies were reported on the milk cartons. Afterward, a woman in the audience cheered, “This is how we should be every night.”
In this cauldron of witches, Ernstberger mixed an intolerable witch into the fan base for his comeback after Mist. Young men who want to get rich and ordinary lawbreakers – they are all united by hatred of the state apparatus. There he will receive his justification.
Was this the campaign I was involved in? Probably.
Democratic dialogue is of course important. But just as important is understanding when we turn into useful idiots, used, for example, to spread the story of a completely unreasonable conspiracy against a financial puppy.
Read more chronicles by Johannes Klenell.
