This is a comment text. The author is responsible for the analysis and positioning in the text.
Last weekend, another American politician took the podium and told Europeans that the rights of the strong now prevail and that libertarian Europe needs to become less libertarian and more Maga. For some reason, the threatening message was applauded by the Swedish Minister for Civil Protection. Carl-Oskar Bohlin was apparently so impressed by the reactionary atmosphere that he thought it was appropriate stand up and clap their hands.
While it feels decidedly unsafe to be represented by a minister who liked what he heard when Rubio spoke, after all, there are opposing trends in the world right now.
I won’t say there’s a revolution going on. But the arrest of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is quite disturbing.
Although Queen Elizabeth reportedly contributed many millions of pounds to the settlement, the public and media refused to give up
The former prince has just lived an entire life in accordance with the rights of the strong. He seems to have abused every privilege given to him to the utmost. Virginia Giuffre testified about how she was sexually abused by the prince when she was 17, and despite her death and despite Queen Elizabeth reportedly contributing many millions of pounds to the settlement, the public and media refused to leave the matter open.
Why this stubbornness?
Of course, there is a certain level of bloodlust and a revolutionary, almost carnivalesque joy in overthrowing someone from the throne. But also a highly motivated sense of justice, the instinct that builds democracies.
Untrue stories make people angry. As soon as they sense that what they have been told is not true, that their admiration for something is based on a false foundation, everything can be turned upside down.
Prince Andrew was the relatively handsome prince in the naval uniform and was known to have a “penchant for women,” which was often phrased as “Randy Andy” in the British press. Perhaps a little awkward for the queen, but most importantly it dressed the prince and gave the admirable but less than sensual British court a touch of masculinity – something like that.
Then, when it seemed likely that he had taken advantage of the human trafficking victim of his very good friend Jeffrey Epstein, the whole story fell apart. Andrew wasn’t a womanizer, he was just a grumpy bastard and people forced a subordination on him that they ultimately couldn’t accept.
By this point, the anger had been building up for so long that it wasn’t enough to strip him of his titles and banish him to the outskirts of the castle grounds. In the end, the law must prevail, equality before the law applies.
The image of him being chased away from the police station is already iconic. The ex-prince’s eyes widened, one eye red from the flash
Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor is now under investigation on suspicion that he shared confidential information with Epstein during his time as a trade envoy to Great Britain. The image of him being chased away from the police station is already iconic. The ex-prince’s eyes widened, one eye red from the flash.
“Now he’s sweating,” The Sun writes satirically in the image’s caption, referencing his famous claim that he couldn’t sweat and therefore couldn’t have been the Brit that Giuffre allegedly met and took advantage of.
It’s in the nature and I feel sorry for the man in the picture. He looks broken. It’s a crazy journey to take in a lifetime.
Donald Trump finds the arrest of Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor “very sad”.
The image shows us that men who grossly abuse their power can fall. And Trump, he knows that the rule of the strong no longer applies when the smell of weakness spreads and the masses finally tire of lies.
Read more:
Sandra Stiskalo: An ex-prince in prison would be something incredible
